StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Illinois Appeal Voids Transmission Project Permit

8/11/2016

1 Comment

 
Court determines Rock Island Clean Line is not a public utility and orders Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC)
to reverse its Order granting Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN)

 In an Opinion handed down August 10, the Illinois Third District Court of Appeals reversed the Order of the Illinois Commerce Commission that granted a certificate of public convenience and necessity to the Rock Island Clean Line, and remanded the cause to the Commission with directions to enter an order consistent with its decision.
 
This is a major setback for the project, which was granted a CPCN by the ICC in 2014.  In its decision, the Court found that Rock Island failed to meet two requirements for being a public utility because it does not own, control, operate, or manage assets within the State; and that the proposed transmission line is not for public use without discrimination.  Because Rock Island is not a public utility, the Court said, the ICC lacked authority to issue a CPCN in the first place.
 
“We are thrilled with the Court’s decision,” said Block RICL spokeswoman Mary Mauch.  “We have worked very hard to protect our private property rights from a speculative business venture looking to cash in on our heritage for their own financial gain.  This decision to void RICL’s permit makes all that hard work worthwhile!”
 
Rock Island Clean Line is a 500-mile high-voltage direct current electric transmission line proposed to run from northwestern Iowa to northeast Illinois.  It is owned by Clean Line Energy Partners of Houston, Texas, who is also developing at least two other transmission projects to capitalize on moving energy from the Midwest into expensive eastern electric markets.  Clean Line is currently supported by financial contributions from private investors while it struggles to get any one of its projects off the planning table to begin generating revenue.
 
The Court’s Opinion can be viewed here.
1 Comment

Transmission Myths Often Mistakenly Believed and Then Utilized to Support Unsuccessful Practices

8/5/2016

1 Comment

 
The EUCI industry echo chamber is at it again.

Congratulations, Midwesterners, you now have your very own special EUCI conference!  Dealing with you has become a specialized practice area for the transmission industry.  What is it about you that makes you special?  Is it your attachment to your land?  Your love of uncluttered, wide-open spaces?  Your appreciation for peaceful, non-industrial landscapes?  Your honesty?  Your sense of justice and fair play?  Your mistrust of outsiders who want to take something from you?  The transmission industry sure would love to figure out what makes you tick!

That's why they will be gathering to discuss you at Transmission Expansion in the Midwest this coming October.  Attendees believe they will:
...explore the specifics of how to develop and maintain positive landowner relationships while negotiating in good faith for pipeline, electric transmission, wind and solar, rail and public sector projects. This would include whether pursuing site leasing, site purchase, easements, right of ways and/or workspace, and whether coming from the perspective of project management, design engineering, environmental, appraising, permitting, survey, right of way, inspections, construction, operations, and others, this presentation is a must in helping ensure a successful project, on time and on budget with happy landowners.
That just can't happen.  No landowner is ever "happy" when electric transmission is sited on their property.  Never.

But EUCI bravely soldiers on, putting together these industry echo chambers where industry speakers hide their failure in order to pretend they're successful. Whatever... they're only fooling themselves.  The reality is that it's getting harder and harder to permit, site, and build transmission in the face of record-breaking opposition.  Opposition is bigger.  Opposition is faster.  Opposition is more sophisticated and successful than ever before.  So, what do EUCI's speakers know about the opposition that delays, alters and flat-out cancels even the most carefully planned transmission projects?  Not much.  Not only are the industry critters lacking perspective, they absolutely have no idea what motivates opposition.  Why?  Because they've never been an opponent!  And they don't want to learn from any opposition heathens.  Wouldn't these classes be better taught by the opposition?  Instead, you get this:
Recognize and understand landowner’s perspectives and the importance of dealing with unique differences in various landowners, their personalities and their needs/concerns.
Who's going to help you understand landowner perspectives?  A landowner?  No, a land agent, the arch nemesis of a landowner.  If I really wanted to understand someone, I'd like to talk with that person, not their enemy.

And then there's this:
Beyond the historical considerations of zoning, environmental, special use, conservation and damages determination, communities are becoming more and more vocal in their requirements in infrastructure development.  As social media and cyber-activism have become the norm (even for landowners not impacted by a project), companies need to become social-savvy in route planning, outreach and negotiations.  More often than not, whether in the electric industry or in other related industries, projects are successful or fail spectacularly due to communication issues, lack of messaging and poor understanding of the locale impacted.
Would this presentation be helped by a local opposition perspective?  Definitely.  However, you're not going to get that at EUCI.  Again, this is presented by a land agent who isn't from the community where transmission is located.  The land agent has no experience presenting successful social media campaigns that draw in opponents and keep them active and engaged throughout the process.  Transmission company ideas of social media campaigns consist of cherry-picked and carefully wrapped one-way communications directed at communities.  There's nothing interactive about it if you don't agree with the company position presented.  Companies, ever afraid of legal missteps, cannot and will not communicate with opponents in an informal, down-to-earth manner.  Company social media campaigns are a complete waste of time.

KURT ALERT!!!!  Of course a Midwestern Transmission Expansion conference wouldn't be complete without some fantasy from Clean Line Energy Partners!  Except Clean Line's presentations are always the same.  No creativity there!
Case Study: Delivering Wind Energy to Market

The United States possesses some of the best renewable energy resources in the world. However, continued growth of the renewable energy industry in the U.S. faces a serious challenge: the lack of transmission. Clean Line Energy is developing a series of long-haul direct current transmission lines to deliver low-cost renewable energy to communities that have a strong demand for clean power.

This presentation will focus on the Grain Belt Express Clean Line, which will deliver wind energy from Kansas into Missouri, Illinois and Indiana. The project has received its regulatory approvals in Kansas, Illinois and Indiana and is currently working through the final state approval process in Missouri. The presentation will provide an update on the regulatory, routing, and other milestones accomplished with a focus on the benefits this project will bring to Missouri.

Amy Kurt, Director of Development, Clean Line Energy Partners
Benefits?  Pretend jobs and tax revenue?  Economic development isn't the basis for eminent domain.

And that's just the problem.  Eminent domain.  As long as eminent domain is on the table, there will be no "happy" landowners.  It's not about "communication" or psychological manipulation of landowners, it's not about siting, it's not about getting to know the community values, it's not about made-up "benefits," it's not about purchased "support" for transmission projects.  It's about the eminent domain.

No matter how much smoke and mirrors this industry generates in its echo chamber, it will continue to face increasingly effective opposition and transmission projects will fail.

Checkmate.
1 Comment

Southern Cross Transmission - Just One More Attempt to Take Private Property for Corporate Gain

7/31/2016

1 Comment

 
It's not about where to put the Southern Cross Transmission line, it's about whether to build it at all.

Here we go again...
However, most the attendees at the Bell Schoolhouse Fire Station meeting opposed the project. Dennis Daniels, who organized the meeting, said he has already been a victim of eminent domain once and does not want to go through the process again.
 
"Honestly I don't have any questions for (representatives)," he said. "I just don't want them to come through my property."
 
He's concerned that the power line will decrease property values, restrict further development on his land and be an eyesore.
 
"It bothers me most that it's a private, for-profit company," he said. "They're going to use eminent domain to take our property rights away to give to a company in San Francisco to make millions of dollars off of each year."

The Southern Cross transmission project is another unneeded HVDC merchant project intended to ship renewable energy into higher priced markets for corporate profit.  But this one isn't owned by Houston-based Clean Line Energy.  It's owned by a different company, San Francisco-based Pattern Energy.  Pattern proposes that it shall build a 400-mile HVDC transmission project across Louisiana and Mississippi in order to serve energy markets in "the southeast electric grid" with wind energy generated in Texas.

The Texas wind market is tapped out.  They've built so much wind generation and transmission to ship it around the state that sometimes they have to give it away for free. 
But yet, Texas wants to be its own little electric grid, islanded from the rest of the nation's power grid.  Except when all its renewable energy goodness tanks prices.  Then Texas wants to connect to the rest of the grid in order to export its excess wind generation into other markets where it will fetch higher prices.  And that's the only purpose for Southern Cross.

This project has been in the works for years, but was only recently sprung on landowners along its 400-mile route.  And chaos ensued.  Of course the landowners don't want to be forced to sacrifice their property, personal wealth and peace of mind for the benefit of electricity consumers in other states in "the southeast."  Southern Cross will only interconnect with the rest of the grid serving Louisiana and Mississippi at two converter stations, one near the Texas-Louisiana border, and the second near the Mississippi-Alabama border.  What's in it for all the residents of Louisiana and Mississippi in between?  Not much.

And to make matters worse, landowners in Mississippi are getting smoke blown in their faces by one of their PSC Commissioners, who is urging them to communicate with Pattern Energy instead of the PSC.
In a public meeting at the Bell Schoolhouse Fire Station just outside Starkville Thursday, Public Service Commissioner Brandon Presley urged residents to reach out to representatives from Southern Cross Transmission if they have questions about the company's proposed wind energy transmission line.
 
"Let it not be said of you that you didn't call on these people and that you didn't file an objection," Presley said at the meeting.

While eminent domain is not out of the question, Presley said he believes the company will do everything in its power to avoid having to use it. Southern Cross representatives have told him they have put in similar lines in other parts of the country without resorting to eminent domain.

Presley said his office received a plethora of letters, emails and phone calls from property owners who received letters. In a meeting with company representatives, Presley said someone from the company has to meet with property owners one-on-one at the time and place of the landowner's choosing.
 
In an interview with The Dispatch Thursday, Presley said a Southern Cross representative had already begun meeting with landowners individually. Presley also had the company designate a point of contact for landowners to call. Since then, his office has received fewer calls from concerned citizens.
 
In June, Southern Cross Transmission sent letters to landowners whose property is within 500 feet of one of the proposed routes and promised to hold meetings and answer questions from landowners. The company then hosted an open house for property owners, but many left that meeting with more questions than answers, Presley said.
 
Legally, Southern Cross Transmission doesn't have to communicate with the public at all until it has decided on a route and filed a proposal with the Public Service Commission. But Presley wants to ensure that the company shows landowners the dignity and respect they deserve.

Sure, that makes Presley's job easier if all the landowners have folded and granted easements to Pattern Energy before it files its application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and eminent domain authority in the state.  But, for the landowners, it's not simply about where to put the line, but whether or not to build it in the first place.

Pattern is misleading landowners about FERC's authority to permit this project.
FERC has previously found that the interconnection of the Southern Cross Project to the ERCOT transmission system is in the public interest and that the Project will create substantial benefits both for the ERCOT and the Southeast regions.
But FERC has no authority to permit this transmission project, or to grant eminent domain authority over private property to Pattern Energy.  Only the states do.  Both Louisiana and Mississippi will have to find need and public benefit for the project in their respective states.

Landowners can make a big difference by participating in the PSC process, and that's where they should be directing their energies right now, not wasting their time discussing where to put the project with Pattern Energy.
Southern Cross Transmission plans to settle on a route and file its proposal with the commission this fall. Once that happens, Presley said, citizens have 20 days to file an objection, which gives them legal rights in the case.
Not much time, opponents need to prepare to file objections, or better yet to intervene in the case.
He requested landowners write down whatever questions they have, take those questions directly to the company and wait until they had met with Southern Cross representatives before deciding whether to oppose the project.
Don't waste your time, landowners.  Begin crafting your "fact-based" arguments now, but the only facts you need to begin is that Southern Cross's proposal will affect your interest in real property located on or near a proposed route.  And don't think if your property is on a proposed route that is later taken off the table that you're safe.  Until an actual siting permit is granted, routes can and will change, with very little notice.  In fact, the companies like it better if landowners don't know anything about the project until the bulldozers show up.  How can you cause trouble for them if you're unaware?

Exactly... and that's why landowners are getting such late notice about this project.  But there's still plenty of time to organize and legally intervene.  The bigger the stink, the better the chances the project will be cancelled.
Presley has also said he will not approve the project unless the company can prove it has some benefit to Mississippi.
 
"I'm as much for clean air and clean energy as the next guy, but it's got to be about more than renewable energy," he said. "For us, that's a plus, but there has to be other things."
I'm sure Commissioner Presley is "for clean air and clean energy."  After all, the Sierra Club was a big donor to his campaign to be elected to the PSC.  And Sierra Club has never seen a transmission project "for wind" that it didn't love.
"At the end of the day, the ability to connect into wind energy, which does not cost anything as far as burning coal, burning natural gas, (is) obviously an energy source that could have a benefit to the state," Presley said.
 
"That's the benefit," he added. "But also obviously if this electricity is low cost, I'm not going to be supporting trucking it through Mississippi to pump it to Atlanta, Georgia, and our people have cheap electricity ran over the top of their property and not being able to take advantage of it."
That's nice to hear, but Commissioner Presley has coyly avoided the elephant in the room.  Eminent domain.  While eminent domain has historically been used to construct transmission lines for which there is some reliability need, using that authority to build transmission lines for the sole purpose of moving renewable energy to higher priced eastern electric markets is an issue of first impression.  In the case of transmission solely for profit, eminent domain takes on a whole new purpose:  Eminent domain for the private gain of a company located in San Francisco.  And that's just the rub.
1 Comment

How To Violate Your "Code of Conduct" Before You Even Begin

7/29/2016

0 Comments

 
If this were a guide published today, it might be written by Clean Line Energy Partners.

Today, the company engineered a press release that says "TRC Supports Clean Line Energy."  Who is TRC?  Is TRC an elected official?  Is TRC a regulator?  Is TRC a transmission customer?  Is TRC's "support" of Clean Line relevant to Clean Line's regulatory approval, or even the approval of the landowners whose property the project wants to cross?

The answer is none of the above.  TRC is Clean Line's newest contractor.  In exchange for $12M, TRC says it will, "provide land acquisition services, survey permissions and overall project management for the Plains & Eastern Clean Line transmission project."  Of course TRC "supports" Clean Line.... it stands to pocket $12M for its efforts to coerce landowners to sign survey permissions and easement agreements.  Does TRC's "support" for Clean Line necessitate YOUR support?  Of course not, that's ridiculous!

Clean Line has been resoundingly rebuffed by landowners across its route.  So, what's the new plan?  Employment of propaganda devices such as testimonial, card stacking, and bandwagon.  Oh, whoop-de-doo, Clean Line!

TRC thinks you care if it makes the following statement:
The Plains & Eastern Clean Line is one of the largest clean energy infrastructure projects in the country. It will provide a pathway for 4,000 megawatts of low-cost wind power to be delivered from Oklahoma to the Mid-South and Southeast. The agreement between Clean Line Energy and TRC, which has a major office located in Tulsa, furthers Clean Line's commitment to working with local suppliers.
"Clean Line Energy's mission of building modern energy infrastructure closely aligns with our own core values of sustainability, including our commitment to grow our clean energy services year over year," said Chris Vincze, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "The 700-mile transmission line will improve the U.S. electric grid, support economic development and job growth, and make safe, reliable and lower-cost power available to consumers.
Wait a minute... is TRC acquiring survey permissions and easement agreements, or is it leading a cheerleading squad?  How much arrogance does it take to believe that some company's belief in a project has relevance to your personal decisions regarding your land?

And we're just getting started here...
TRC will provide program management, acquisition of environmental and cultural survey consents, and acquisition support. It also will be communicating with landowners across the route to educate them about the benefits of the project.
What?  "Educating landowners about the benefits of the project?"  What does that have to do with acquiring easements and survey permissions?  Sounds like some kind of brain-washing attempt to coerce landowners to sign on the dotted line.  Does Clean Line really believe that the only barrier to land acquisition and survey permission is "education" of landowners?  News Flash!  The landowners are already "educated," which is why they have been rejecting all Clean Line's attempts, not only at acquiring permission, but at any contact with the company at all.  The landowners got "educated" years ago by opponents of the Clean Line projects.  They know everything they need to know to tell Clean Line to go away.  Clean Line does NOT have eminent domain authority.  The most Clean Line can do is annoy landowners with their "offers."  Clean Line cannot make any legal filing to condemn and take property.  Instead, Clean Line must turn over acquisition of any property it cannot obtain to the U.S. Department of Energy.  The DOE may then reattempt permissions, but only after Clean Line has reached certain milestones with its project.  First, Clean Line must find customers for its transmission capacity.  It has not made any customers public.  It also must receive financing to construct its entire project.  It has not made any financing public.  It's going to be a long time before the DOE comes calling with more offers for landowners, and only DOE has the authority to condemn and take property through the courts.  Meanwhile, landowners can tell Clean Line and TRC to go take their Vulcan mind-meld tricks for a flying leap off the nearest cliff, mountain, hill, rock, or pebble.

What's in it for the landowner to sign permissions now?  Nothing.  Big goose egg.  Zero.  What's in it for the landowner to sign an easement agreement now?  A payment of a small percentage of the easement's value.  That's right... Clean Line wants you to sign over your property rights today in exchange for a portion of their monetary value.  You give Clean Line permission to use your property today, but they're not going to pay you in full for that permission for up to four years.  Landowners would essentially be allowing Clean Line to buy their property rights on the installment plan.  Doesn't sound like much "benefit" to the landowner. 

And let's talk about Clean Line's "self-policed" Code of Conduct.  This document is nothing but window dressing.  Since Clean Line is the only party enforcing this worthless document, it can do whatever it wants.

Behold:
Do not represent that a relative, neighbor and/or friend supports or opposes the Project.

Do not suggest that any person should be ashamed of or embarrassed by his or her opposition to the Project or that such opposition is inappropriate.

Do not argue with property owners about the merits of the Project.


All things that Clean Line and its contractors, such as TRC, cannot do.

But yet, TRC has taken to the media to support the project, and has stated that it intends to "educate landowners about the benefits of the project."  That sounds suspiciously like a violation of the Code of Conduct, doesn't it?  After all, if a landowner is already educated about the project, any statement by TRC about the project's benefits is by default argumentative.  Any statements by TRC that "[t]he 700-mile transmission line will improve the U.S. electric grid, support economic development and job growth, and make safe, reliable and lower-cost power available to consumers," are designed to make the resistant landowner ashamed or embarrassed by his or her opposition to the project and insinuate that such opposition is inappropriate.  And it's argumentative.

These people are a day late and a dollar short.  The majority of affected landowners are already "educated" about the project and have found that it doesn't provide any "benefits" for them. 

You've got to get up pretty early in the morning to fool a farmer.  Or a Mayberrian.
0 Comments

Transmission Line "Open Houses" Cause Project Opposition Infernos

7/22/2016

2 Comments

 
The transmission project "Open House" is a public relations ploy designed to indoctrinate an unsuspecting public with transmission company talking points while simultaneously dividing and conquering a community.

This tactic is so old, I don't even know (or much care) where it originated.  All that matters is that it has become an industry "best practice" that needs serious reform.  Transmission companies who utilize "Open House" format are doing nothing but shooting themselves in the foot right out of the starting gate.

The idea behind presenting a project to a community via an "Open House" format is to neutralize the combined energy of an angry crowd, such as would occur if the company presented its project to all attendees at the same time in a town hall format.  By keeping attendees separate, the company believes it is keeping the public from sharing information and validating their ideas with others who share the same unfavorable opinion about the information presented.  An assembled crowd listening to the same information from one speaker would feed off the energy of just a few naysayers until everyone is on the same opposition bandwagon.

But "Open House" meetings simply delay the inevitable.  Unless companies meet with community residents separately, multiple attendees will talk with each other and share opinions.  People band together at times of crisis, and transmission company "Open Houses" are a fertile enabler of impromptu discussions and exchanges of information by community members.  The commiseration of strangers will spill out of the "Open House" venue and continue long after the transmission company employees take off their little name tags and pack up their display posters.  The transmission company "Open House" is the birthplace of transmission project opposition groups.

In the past, each community opposition group had to reinvent the wheel and it took them longer to cause transmission project approval headaches.  Today however, the internet exponentially expands quick access to resources and information used to spray gasoline on an opposition bonfire while anger is fresh.  It's an opposition inferno!

Is there a way to change that outcome?  Sure.  But it's not about meeting format.  It's about how company information is presented.  Current "best practice" intends to lead attendees through a maze of "information stations" where company representatives explain electric energy, environmental protection, the transmission grid, transmission grid planning, need for new transmission lines, and the appearance and function of new lines.  Then the attendee is dumped out into an "information station" where they can look at maps to find out how close their property is to the proposed transmission line.  That's all the attendee cares about, everything else learned at the early stations is completely forgotten when they come to the realization that the project is going to directly affect them.  Then the transmission company hands them a "comment card" and the idea that their opinion matters in the ultimate transmission route.  Attendees are conditioned to frame their comment around pushing the line off their own property and onto that of their neighbor.  That only works for a few minutes while the attendee is earnestly at work trying to avoid the transmission line.  Comment card deposited, the attendee leaves the venue, where others have gathered on sidewalks and in parking lots to discuss the project and resolve to fight it.  Opposition is born.

I came across a news photo recently depicting a transmission company employee talking to attendees at a Southern Cross transmission project "Open House."  It's classic.  Every news story about a transmission line "Open House" includes the obligatory photo of attendees speaking with company employees.  I've seen this photo thousands of times, only the faces change.

Look at this photo.  The body language tells the story.
Nervous transmission company employee tries to explain himself to angry attendees.  Look at the three attendees.  Two have their arms folded across their chest.  That's a defensive posture that indicates they clearly aren't even listening to transmission guy any longer and certainly are long past being receptive to his information.  The attendee in the middle has his hands firmly planted in his pockets, which is also a semi-defensive move that signals insecurity, mistrust and a reluctance to listen.  All three attendees have the same expression on their face.  It's the expression of someone who clearly doesn't believe the person speaking.  You can bet that those three will be talking with each other as soon as transmission guy moves away to talk with other attendees.

But wait... is transmission guy also in the process of shoving his hands in his pockets?  Ahh... insecurity!  And why not?  Who wouldn't be insecure facing down these three?

So, what's the problem?  Transmission guy is presenting them with a fait accompli.  He (and his company and possibly a regional transmission organization) have already made the decision to build a transmission project.  Now, maybe the project is a necessary response to a problem that must be solved.  But nobody likes hearing the solution to a problem, without first considering the problem.

A better approach is not to attempt behavior control of a community to go along with a pre-determined solution, but to involve the community in crafting the solution to a problem that affects them.  Presenting the problem to the community and soliciting possible solutions within a range of possibilities, and being open to new possibilities, creates a whole different dynamic.  It causes attendees to listen to the problem, the possible solutions, and to become involved in solving the problem.  When communities are involved in crafting the solution, they cooperatively "buy in" to the ultimate solution.  Now the solution may not be the company's desired transmission project, so the company needs to demonstrate flexibility in the selected solution.  As long as it gets the job done, right?

But wait... a solution that's not the company's solution might not make the most money for the company.  Look at yourselves, transmission companies, you want to be public utilities, but yet you believe that also gives you the right to make the most money possible from the public you serve.  It doesn't.

Stasis or momentum?  The choice is yours!
2 Comments

Importing Renewables to West Virginia?  No, thanks!

7/12/2016

0 Comments

 
Block Grain Belt Express - Missouri has a brand new petition to let their Public Service Commission know you oppose the building of a 700-mile electric transmission line to export renewables to "states farther east."

Check it out here and add your name as a signer!
I signed it this morning.  Want to know why?
As a resident of a "state farther east" proposed to be the beneficiary of this senseless sacrifice of Missourians, I am not in favor of importing renewables from other states. For years, West Virginians made a sacrifice to export energy to states to the east. Now that the bottom has fallen out of that market, West Virginia is left with nothing to show for its years of sacrifice. We must rebuild our energy economy and that includes building our own renewable energy generators for local use. We cannot afford to ship our energy dollars out of state to import Midwest wind, but must put them to work in our own communities to promote local jobs and economic development. Grain Belt Express is not wanted in Eastern states.
What we need here in West Virginia are local generators, serving local customers, providing local jobs and economic development.  We don't need to ship all our energy dollars to Midwestern states, but invest them at home in our own communities.

Do you want to put your energy dollars to work in your own community?  Or pad the tax coffers of other states and the bank accounts of the foreign investors hoping to strike it rich building unneeded transmission to export renewables from the Midwest?

Those foreign investors and their greenwashing buddies are pretending to represent your interests at the Missouri PSC by purporting that you desperately need and want this energy.  Nothing could be further from the truth, and you need to speak up for yourself now, or risk having foreign investors speak for you!

NOTE:  This is a brand new Block GBE petition.  Even if you signed their petition several years ago, you need to re-sign this new one!  Sign and share it now!
0 Comments

Martha Peine:  Artist or Retired Hippie?

6/28/2016

5 Comments

 
Picture
Only a community of "artists and retired hippies" would laugh about being characterized as such in a news story.  I asked Martha which one she was last night, and she said she was a "wannabe" of both.

It must have been the retired hippie who became an activist for a town threatened by a transmission project that was later determined to be unnecessary.  But it was definitely the artist who negotiated a $4.2M transmission rate refund from "behemoth" energy company American Electric Power.

RTO Insider is running a story today that may be the finish line for Martha's media victory lap.

Against All Odds: Ratepayer Wins $4.2M Refund from AEP chronicles Martha as remarkable, and I'd have to agree.  She waded through hell and high water, and jumped every hurdle erected in her path, to right the wrongs in AEP's transmission rate filings.  And she persevered to victory.  She's one in more than 18 million... the only ratepayer in the Southwest Power Pool who took the time and invested the effort to challenge AEP's rates.

While RTO Insider's coverage may be the final story, it's not my favorite.  While attempting to wade into the technical weeds, the reporter got some things wrong (but, hey, at least Ali's name got spelled right this time!)

A story in a retired hippie and artist newspaper, The Eureka Springs Independent, did a great job with accurate coverage.  Local woman wins $4.2 million settlement for power users says Martha will now "relax into the Eureka Springs tempo for the time being."

Looking forward to joining her later this summer!  I'll bring my tie-dye duds and my sketch pad... and a case of Raging Bitch!

Congratulations, Martha, it's been a gift to meet you and call you friend.
5 Comments

Potomac Edison Says No One Was Harmed by its Failure to Read Electric Meters in Maryland

6/24/2016

0 Comments

 
Wahhhhhhhh.

I could end this blog post there, but I won't.

In May, a Maryland PSC administrative law judge proposed ordering Potomac Edison to change its meter reading frequency to monthly and fined the company a piddly $25K.

That followed an earlier proposed order issued in April, in which the same ALJ said no harm, no foul, and did nothing to punish the company for its transgressions.  The Commission pulled that proposed order and said it was "inadvertently issued."  I guess the judge didn't check with his boss before filing it.  Therefore, the revised order was issued a month later.

Now Potomac Edison and the Maryland Office of People's Counsel are appealing that decision, and basing it on the illegality of the ALJ's sudden change of heart.  The OPC doesn't think monthly meter reading is a solution to a problem that has since solved itself, and that ratepayers shouldn't have to shoulder the financial burden of this company's despicable actions (or lack of action, as the case may be).

You can find all the above filings here.

I guess OPC has a point, why should ratepayers pay to fix Potomac Edison's failure?  That's what happened in West Virginia, where meters are now read every single month.  Buh-bye incorrect estimated bills and huge "catch-up" bills.  Hello wacky bill schedule!  Since a reading must be done before a bill is issued, bills are never issued and due on the same day each month.  This presents a problem for folks who are only paid monthly, such as social security recipients, where they may receive two bills due within the same pay period.

But the anger is nowhere near that displayed across three states in the wake of Allegheny Energy's merger with Ohio dimwits FirstEnergy.  Perhaps if Maryland's Staff and OPC had paid attention to the West Virginia proceeding several years ago, they'd know that the meter reading failure was directly tied to the company's post-merger actions.  FirstEnergy insisted that Allegheny Energy toss out its perfectly good bill estimation methods designed to mesh with its alternate month reading schedule.  It had been working in WV for 30 years.  Instead, FirstEnergy insisted Allegheny adopt its own estimation routine, which was designed for missed reads in a system based on monthly reads.  That's right, while it may have worked fine for FirstEnergy subsidiaries that read meters monthly, it did NOT work for Allegheny's bi-monthly read system.  Combine that with FirstEnergy's "reorganization" of Allegheny's meter reading department and switch to "contract" meter readers who are paid less and must use their own vehicles, instead of a company-maintained motor pool, and disaster ensued. 

Whose fault was this?  FirstEnergy's!!

Only because of the scrutiny received in West Virginia (and to a lesser extent in Maryland, since the MD PSC was quite effective in preventing the customers from being heard during the heat of the moment) did the company take action to fix their mess.  Because Maryland waited so long to actually DO anything, the problems are long since over.

Now Potomac Edison says their actions didn't actually hurt anyone in Maryland because there's nothing in the record.  And there's nothing in the record because the MD PSC cancelled the public hearing it initially scheduled on this matter.  Then shoved the case off to mediation for years.  Then held a hearing.  Then issued two orders FIVE YEARS after the damage was done.  Justice delayed is justice denied, in this instance.

Potomac Edison also whines about the measly $25K fine the ALJ imposed.  $25K probably wouldn't even pay for two seats in the FirstEnergy CEO's special "luxury suite" at FirstEnergy stadium.  And yet this company has the nerve to cry like a baby over $25K.

So, hot potato passes to the MD PSC Commissioners, who seem to be responsible for the amended proposed order, so we'll assume it's to their liking.  Who knows, maybe Chatty Chuck will invite the Commissioners to watch a game in his luxury suite!  Woo Hoo!
0 Comments

Mark Twain's Ghost Thinks You're Ridiculous, Bob

6/20/2016

1 Comment

 
Peppering every thought and process with quotes from Mark Twain.  Is that really a thing in Hannibal, Missouri?  Apparently so, judging by this article in the Hannibal Courier-Post.  I guess I've been derelict in my communications efforts directed toward good ol' Bob and his friends at the Hannibal Board of Public Works by not including a trite quote from Twain as a preamble to my opinion.  My bad.  I hereby remedy that failing.

Reporter Danny Henley surely knows
The very ink with which all history is written is merely fluid prejudice.

MARK TWAIN, Following the Equator
Because he obviously didn't look at the actual "contract" between MJMEUC and Grain Belt Express before writing his article.  He relied on Bob Stevenson's sly "memo" to simply report incorrect facts and opinion as "news."
To string incongruities and absurdities together in a wandering and sometimes purposeless way, and seem innocently unaware that they are absurdities, is the basis of the American art, if my position is correct.

MARK TWAIN, "How to Tell a Story"
The contract clearly states it is for transmission capacity ONLY.  Henley needs to quit reporting lies such as this:  "Hannibal was also given the chance to buy electricity for as little as 2 cents per kilowatt hour (kwh)..."  No, they weren't given the opportunity to buy electricity.  They were given the opportunity to buy transmission capacity.  That would be like buying an extension cord, Danny, not signing up for a new account with the electric company.  One provides a means to move electricity from one location to another, and the other actually supplies the electricity.  Without electricity, the extension cord is useless.  And there have been no quotes offered from electricity suppliers.  None.

Henley reports that Bob Stevenson read a "memo" he had written to the BPW at the June meeting of the Board, lamenting that Hannibal had missed out on Grain Belt Express "opportunities."
In order to make a man or a boy covet a thing, it is only necessary to make the thing difficult to obtain.

MARK TWAIN, The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
Picture
Grain Belt Express has a fence that needs whitewashing at the Missouri Public Service Commission.  Someone took away Bob's paintbrush.  Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!

Bob thinks the project is "moving forward without Hannibal."  It's okay, Bob, the project isn't moving anywhere.  It can't go anywhere without eminent domain authority from the MO Public Service Commission, and that contract isn't a guarantee of success.  In fact, if you would actually read it yourself, Bob, you'd see that it's not even a firm contract, but sort of like a pre-contract, where MJMEUC can back out at any time up to 60 days before Grain Belt Express energizes its line.

Bob also expects to receive an offer from MJMEUC to join its useless pre-contract, even though he chose to wax poetic about missed opportunities at the Board's June meeting.  Of course Hannibal is not precluded from buying a paint brush and joining in the whitewashing.  It just made better theater to pretend Hannibal has missed some rare opportunity.

Hannibal should beware unsubstantiated claims that Grain Belt Express will save Hannibal (or any other municipality) money.  It's clear from GBE's "offer" to MJMEUC that the purported $10M/year savings aren't the result of any "study" by MJMEUC (as falsely reported in the press) but a summary of Clean Line's "preliminary calculations." 
Preliminary calculations, assuming existing production tax credits for wind project participation in the project, could reduce costs by as much as $10M/year or $10 per  megawatt hour compared to delivery of other wind projects from SPP to MISO.
It's nothing but Clean Line's made up "preliminary calculations!"  None of the figures in this "calculation" has any validity.
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.

MARK TWAIN, Autobiography
Despite his fretful report that other cities are scheduling council action long before they sign a contract, and urging Hannibal to do so quickly in order not to miss out on this great opportunity, Bob needs to remember that he is merely a servant of the people.
Government is merely a servant – merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a patriot and who isn’t. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them.

MARK TWAIN, The Bible According to Mark Twain
There's no danger "up to 200 MW" of transmission capacity is going to disappear like hot Krispy Kreme donuts.  There's plenty of fence for everyone to paint!

The harder Bob tries to sell GBE, like the world's worst circus sideshow barker, the more suspicious he looks to the people of Hannibal.  Here's what Twain would tell him about his failure:
Its name is Public Opinion. It is held in reverence. It settles everything. Some think it is the voice of God.

MARK TWAIN, Europe and Elsewhere
Trust your ratepayers, Bob.  After you see what happens at the Public Service Commission, you're going to be thanking your lucky stars that it didn't happen to you.
1 Comment

Arkansas Landowner Catches Clean Line Contractors in a Web of Lies

6/15/2016

2 Comments

 
Monkeyshines afoot down in Arkansas
involving Clean Line contractors
An Arkansas landowner along the route of Clean Line's Plains & Eastern Clean Line project smelled a rat when some "surveyors" knocked on his door and asked permission to access his property for a survey recently.  The landowner was smart and immediately reported the violation of Clean Line's "Code of Conduct" to the U.S. Department of Energy.  The U.S. DOE has made itself legally responsible for the actions of a private company by entering into a "Participation Agreement" with Clean Line.  Here's the landowner's description of the incident as reported to the DOE on June 2.
To: [email protected]
Subject: Violation of Code of Conduct

Well, I had an interesting encounter with some Clean Line people this morning.  A surveying crew came to my house this morning.   Of course, they would not admit to working for Clean Line.  I later received a call from a Clean Line representative, asking for permission to enter my property and denying any knowledge of the surveyor crew.

You can read my description of today's events below, but here is the summary.  A survey crew tried to gain access to private property by misrepresenting themselves and a Clean Line rep denied the crew works for Clean Line.

Two surveyors came to my house, asking for permission to enter property that I rent from my neighbor just to the north of my property.  One of them told me that my neighbor had referred them to me.   This fellow told me he was working for the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and he wanted to shoot the corners of the AG&F property which is adjacent to my neighbor's property and my property.  I quizzed him about who he worked for.  He told his company was under contract to do the work for the AG&F.  (Later, I called my neighbor and she said the fellow told her he was doing work for the AG&F.)  I asked for written proof of who he was and that his company was doing work for the AG&F.  He did not have any proof, not even a business card.  I told him I would have to see proof of who he is and who he is working for.  I apologized for the inconvenience.  I told him Clean Line was trying to get access to our property and for all I knew he could be from Clean Line.  

I asked the surveyor if he was doing work for Clean Line and he said no.

I contacted the manager of the AG&F management area.  He said the AG&F did not have a survey crew checking the property lines.  He said he was aware of a Clean Line crew doing an environmental survey in the area.  
 
As soon as the two surveyors left, I started trying to call the AG&F manager.  While on my cell phone, I received a call on the land line.  I asked the caller to call back.  About an hour later a Clean Line rep called, asking for permission to enter my property.  He said he was the person who tried to call earlier.  I told him about the incident with the surveyors and he denied knowing anything about a survey crew trying to get access to my property.  He said it was a big coincidence that he just happened to call a few minutes after the survey crew left.

To recap.  The survey crew said they were doing work for the AG&F.  The AG&F said the surveyors were not working for them. Clean Line is trying to get private property access to do their environmental survey.  It stretches the bounds of credulity to imagine that the survey crew does not work for Clean Line.  The incident is compounded by having a Clean Line rep deny any knowledge of it.

Is this the vaunted Code of Conduct the Department of Energy had in mind when it entered into unholy matrimony with Clean Line?
The landowner further shares that the "surveyors" arrived at his house on an unmarked ATV and when asked for identification, the "surveyor" showed the landowner his t-shirt printed with a logo from a company named "Crafton Tull."  The landowner later saw this crew driving around in an unmarked truck.

The landowner also reports that the Clean Line representative that contacted him via telephone minutes after he refused entry to the "surveyors" touted himself as a Christian who would never lie, as if God himself had blessed Clean Line's actions.
 During our conversation, the CL rep said he didn't know anything about a property line survey crew.  The only surveys he knew anything about were the environmental surveys. When I told him I didn't believe him, he told me he was a born again Christian and he wouldn't lie.
That guy should beware of random lightning bolts from above!

Twelve days later, the landowner received this lame response from the U.S. DOE:
From: "Lawrence, Christopher" <[email protected]>
Date: June 14, 2016 at 11:01:44 AM CDT
To: Landowner
Subject: RE: Violation of Code of Conduct

Hello Mr. Landowner,

Thank you for raising this concern.  The Department takes the requirements of the Participation Agreement very seriously.  The Participation Agreement includes numerous protective measures for property owners, including, as you mention, the Code of Conduct at Schedule 12.  The matter of your concern will be discussed with Clean Line and, as needed, Clean Line's compliance with all of its contractual responsibilities under the Participation Agreement will be clarified.

Christopher A. Lawrence
Electricity Policy Analyst
National Electricity Delivery Division
Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability
U.S. Department of Energy
O-(202) 586-5260
F-(202) 586-8008
[email protected]
So, the DOE merely "discusses" violations of the Code of Conduct with Clean Line and "clarifies" its responsibilities under the Agreement.  In other words, DOE does NOTHING to punish violations of its Agreement or prevent them from recurring.  You're going to have to protect yourself.  U.S. DOE's "landowner protections" are nothing but smoke and mirrors.

Let's see how many violations of the Code of Conduct occurred in this instance:
All communications with property owners and occupants must be factually correct and made in good faith.
  1. Do not make false or misleading statements.
  2. Do not purposely or intentionally misrepresent any fact.
When contacting a property owner in person, promptly identify yourself as representing Plains & Eastern.
The landowner involved in this incident was smart.  He asked for some identification before allowing a stranger to roam his property.  Anyone could show up unannounced and pretend they were working for a surveying or land acquisition company in order to gain access to a landowner's home or property.  Ask to see a photo ID and written documentation of the stranger's purpose for calling on you.  Don't be a victim!

Landowners who experience a violation of Clean Line's "Code of Conduct" should promptly report all violations to the U.S. DOE.  Our government needs to acknowledge its responsibility for all abuses of public trust perpetrated by its "partner" in this unnecessary transmission project.

Landowners should also be in touch with the folks at Golden Bridge, who are keeping a record of landowner contacts gone awry.  Contact them at [email protected].  You could additionally report Clean Line's transgressions to the Arkansas Attorney General.  And if you believe "surveyors" are misrepresenting themselves as working for a state agency, do contact that state agency to report the incident.  No state agency wants to end up legally responsible for damage to private property caused by "surveyors" who are not authorized by their agency.

Shame on you, Clean Line!

Shame on you, U.S. Department of Energy!
2 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.